Edited by KingCobra, 18 March 2013 - 05:48 PM.
Mwo Vs Sto
#1
Posted 18 March 2013 - 05:38 PM
#2
Posted 18 March 2013 - 05:40 PM
I'm not interested in space combat in MWO, and I'm not interested in people PVP. People PVP in STO sucked too, the ship combat was alright but the game was not really well suited to people fighting people. Not like Warcraft at least.
#3
Posted 18 March 2013 - 05:41 PM
#4
Posted 18 March 2013 - 05:42 PM
#5
Posted 18 March 2013 - 05:45 PM
#6
Posted 18 March 2013 - 05:59 PM
Kaarde, on 18 March 2013 - 05:45 PM, said:
Well a lot has changed in StarTrek online in the past few months ground battles are now playable in team factions you can build whole units with fleet credits in a few days you will see a whole new PVP system put in. So the devs work and strive to make the game better just like MWO devs do. They have even discussed huge ground battles with mechs and supporting units like armored core or chrome hounds so it might not end up to bad by years end.
#7
Posted 18 March 2013 - 06:09 PM
that vision was from way before MWO has even been announced, so this is not criticism towards PGI´s vision of the game
Merky Merc, on 18 March 2013 - 05:42 PM, said:
lovely thought
Edited by Adrienne Vorton, 18 March 2013 - 06:13 PM.
#8
Posted 18 March 2013 - 06:12 PM
And I had a LTS for it before it went f2p
KingCobra, on 18 March 2013 - 05:59 PM, said:
Well a lot has changed in StarTrek online in the past few months ground battles are now playable in team factions you can build whole units with fleet credits in a few days you will see a whole new PVP system put in. So the devs work and strive to make the game better just like MWO devs do. They have even discussed huge ground battles with mechs and supporting units like armored core or chrome hounds so it might not end up to bad by years end.
know what this says to me? Their devs as so desperate to revive the game theyre throwing out any vision they had for the game and taking ideas directly from the players only. Or they have NO ideas anymore.
#9
Posted 18 March 2013 - 06:14 PM
#10
Posted 18 March 2013 - 06:19 PM
#11
Posted 18 March 2013 - 06:19 PM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 18 March 2013 - 06:12 PM, said:
And I had a LTS for it before it went f2p
know what this says to me? Their devs as so desperate to revive the game theyre throwing out any vision they had for the game and taking ideas directly from the players only. Or they have NO ideas anymore.
Current registered players in STO is about 5 million+ so its not dying and there revenue is 800,000+ a month and yes the devs do listen to the players but a lot of the ideas are there own as well. Im not saying MWO should have been made exactly like STO maybe like some have said STO/EVE/MechWarrior/DUST/etc but it would have been a game I would have played for the next 20+ years I can tell you that and supported it like I do MWO now only x100 USD.
#12
Posted 18 March 2013 - 06:20 PM
I love stompy 'bots and bleed MW, but this random CS-style stuff is getting really, really old. If CW doesn't bring something with some permanence to it, I might be looking for an affair with another title.
#13
Posted 18 March 2013 - 06:41 PM
Xtrekker, on 18 March 2013 - 06:20 PM, said:
I love stompy 'bots and bleed MW, but this random CS-style stuff is getting really, really old. If CW doesn't bring something with some permanence to it, I might be looking for an affair with another title.
I always envisioned MWO as a more immersive version of the NBT-HC I'd known and loved. Still waiting to see.
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users